{ "schema_version": 1, "title": "重新组织 · 第一季", "description": "AI 时代的分工、权力与人的价值。", "language": "zh-CN", "author": "LeenMa", "license": { "id": "CC-BY-4.0", "url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/LICENSE" }, "website_url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/", "repository_url": "https://github.com/leenlbma/reorganize", "directory_url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/llms.txt", "fulltext_url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/llms-full.txt", "article_count": 12, "articles": [ { "id": "s01-01", "order": 1, "title": "当“组织工作”本身也能被 AI 执行", "part": "重新解释团队", "topic": "工作", "markdown_url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/articles/01-work.md", "reading_url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/#/read/1", "sha256": "00b5c1861761cfb0300b6d5f80718af476403db95e970e99ca7784e8c8374d39", "diagram": { "url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/images/s01-01.svg", "title": "先拆开工作，再决定交给谁", "description": "目标是完成一条可信的商品视频。先分别确认商品事实和检查可用素材，两类信息共同决定本次制作路径：补充证据、复用素材或重新制作。交付后检查结果，只重新处理受影响的部分。人确认事实与表达，Agent在授权内整理资料、制作和修改。" } }, { "id": "s01-02", "order": 2, "title": "超级个体之后，为什么还需要团队？", "part": "重新解释团队", "topic": "团队", "markdown_url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/articles/02-teams.md", "reading_url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/#/read/2", "sha256": "1e117aafaf73887dd17befd8ffc700077b45f73afe7399e00e37ee0708d78c87", "diagram": { "url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/images/s01-02.svg", "title": "哪些协作值得保留？", "description": "团队围绕共同结果发挥四类作用：补充缺少的能力，带入不同视角，共同作出判断，以及共同承担后果。AI可以支持这些活动，但需要明确谁带入了哪些视角、谁参与选择、谁持续承担承诺。仅仅传递信息的交接可以检查是否有简化空间。" } }, { "id": "s01-03", "order": 3, "title": "AI 会拉平差距，还是放大强者？", "part": "重新解释团队", "topic": "能力与资源", "markdown_url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/articles/03-judgment-leverage.md", "reading_url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/#/read/3", "sha256": "4d73918655fdd59826e4ee23431c5421f0235c54b58047e51f2cfbbcaf3de4d1", "diagram": { "url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/images/s01-03.svg", "title": "让能力放大，也让更多人成长", "description": "AI帮助更多人跨越入门门槛。获得经验和反馈的人可以承担更难的判断，并在明确授权下扩大执行能力。经过验证的好方法被整理成公共能力，支持更多人继续成长。数据、工具权限和学习机会影响这个循环能否成立，每一环都需要纠错反馈。" } }, { "id": "s01-04", "order": 4, "title": "AI 时代，我们还需要“流程”吗？", "part": "重建协作机制", "topic": "规则", "markdown_url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/articles/04-policy.md", "reading_url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/#/read/4", "sha256": "20fb8f980cf7ea9032b756bec0106a276b4d85acc2297416db024c9dfb30d09d", "diagram": { "url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/images/s01-04.svg", "title": "哪些固定，哪些可以变化？", "description": "商品事实、价格、版权和审核边界是必须满足的条件。检查当前情况后，缺少证据就先补证据，有可用素材就复用，表达需要调整就局部制作。不同路径都需要按同一组条件验收。路径可以变化，真实依赖、授权和质量要求仍然有效。" } }, { "id": "s01-05", "order": 5, "title": "谁有权定义组织的事实？", "part": "重建协作机制", "topic": "事实与状态", "markdown_url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/articles/05-live-state.md", "reading_url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/#/read/5", "sha256": "2bb2b2723b606ec673000daffdd5d9e2ac58671d807c5edc677446efca6542a7", "diagram": { "url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/images/s01-05.svg", "title": "一条组织状态，怎样才可信？", "description": "原始证据应记录来源、时间和责任人。形成状态时，分别标记已确认、推断或未知：已确认有明确依据，推断保留解释与不确定性，未知说明证据缺失或冲突，留下争议意见并继续核对。使用状态时携带标签和证据。受影响的人可以提出异议并附上新证据，由指定责任人复核、纠错、保留修改记录并通知受影响的使用者。新证据再更新状态，不能直接覆盖仍存在的分歧。" } }, { "id": "s01-06", "order": 6, "title": "组织变扁了，权力却可能更集中", "part": "重建协作机制", "topic": "决定权", "markdown_url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/articles/06-decision-rights.md", "reading_url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/#/read/6", "sha256": "e55a927c6b9958e655ffeeb1ec8e6213354ee726cd7d2061dd4152a52db53b39", "diagram": { "url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/images/s01-06.svg", "title": "信息共享以后，谁来决定？", "description": "同一份可信信息可以由项目团队、Agent、跨团队参与者和公司负责人共享。决定权按事项而不是按信息可见性分配：低风险且依赖现场信息的事项交给项目团队；规则明确、可验证、可回滚且已授权的事项可以交给Agent；多团队依赖或资源冲突需要协商并指定负责人；高风险、不可逆或公司层面的价值取舍由相应负责人决定。每项授权都需要明确边界、责任、升级和复核。" } }, { "id": "s01-07", "order": 7, "title": "当 AI 开始承担工作，谁来承担责任？", "part": "重建协作机制", "topic": "责任", "markdown_url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/articles/07-accountability.md", "reading_url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/#/read/7", "sha256": "1d502b8440d4768f4d907a0b2e1be0709ecfbc38b89d13d2812a649f3a947d23", "diagram": { "url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/images/s01-07.svg", "title": "按风险选择介入方式", "description": "先判断行动是否可逆、影响范围、不确定性和价值取舍。低风险且结果可验证的任务可自主执行；高频重复且风险可观察的任务可执行后抽检；遇到证据冲突或规则越界时暂停相关动作并升级；高风险或难以撤回的事项由人决定。所有模式都需保留暂停、证据保存和升级入口。负责人需要信息、专业判断能力和干预权限。" } }, { "id": "s01-08", "order": 8, "title": "把经验教给 AI，员工为什么愿意？", "part": "人的参与和成长", "topic": "贡献与回报", "markdown_url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/articles/08-incentives.md", "reading_url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/#/read/8", "sha256": "6aebe687bcbfef96248c61e475a36e5d8de4ea77473bd6af6e73d6a8cf38a166", "diagram": { "url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/images/s01-08.svg", "title": "贡献怎样得到持续回报？", "description": "贡献者整理方法并记录创作和维护投入，团队在具体场景中复用并保留改动记录。评价时检查实际结果，包括质量、收益和额外成本，而不只统计调用次数。根据事先约定兑现认可、收益、机会或时间等回报，使贡献者有条件继续建设。回报方式需要协商，不能从调用量直接推导。" } }, { "id": "s01-09", "order": 9, "title": "AI 接走了初级工作，下一代专家从哪里来？", "part": "人的参与和成长", "topic": "学习", "markdown_url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/articles/09-learning.md", "reading_url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/#/read/9", "sha256": "0b7689da4f1b363428c26622a0a6c71db414807213ced5745882464df3fdbd01", "diagram": { "url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/images/s01-09.svg", "title": "让新人亲自经历关键判断", "description": "新人先写下自己的判断和依据，再让Agent搜集证据，然后由新人选择下一步行动。在获得真实结果后，与导师对照预期和结果，解释差异，并修正下一次判断。Agent可以接走搜索与执行，但不能替代新人亲自面对关键选择。评价重点是能否说明依据、识别未知并随新证据改判。" } }, { "id": "s01-10", "order": 10, "title": "当 Agent 成为组织成员，管理者到底在管理什么？", "part": "重写管理与公司", "topic": "管理", "markdown_url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/articles/10-agent-management.md", "reading_url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/#/read/10", "sha256": "cbbe8dec76004a3823b2b29773e9d61c522a56396606dfaa67afd4da9b5f6f87", "diagram": { "url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/images/s01-10.svg", "title": "把一次投诉变成下一次改进", "description": "处理投诉前，约定解决用户问题的目标及退款、转人工等边界。再安排谁查证、谁决定和谁执行，使人与Agent分工清楚。完成后评价用户问题是否解决，并记录耗时、误判和新增负担。经复核的失败原因用于更新规则与训练案例，小范围验证后进入下一轮工作。目标或评价发生争议时，需要由负责人组织复核，不能只优化单一指标。" } }, { "id": "s01-11", "order": 11, "title": "当能力都可以调用，我们为什么还需要公司？", "part": "重写管理与公司", "topic": "公司边界", "markdown_url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/articles/11-firm-boundaries.md", "reading_url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/#/read/11", "sha256": "687b5bf3b4a91249874baffea34979050a34bb3bac03a70e495bebae1cdc7c3b", "diagram": { "url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/images/s01-11.svg", "title": "一项能力，应该怎样获得？", "description": "先判断一项能力需要怎样的控制与积累，再选择长期拥有、阶段性合作或按需调用。决定差异化、依赖持续学习或涉及关键控制权的能力值得持续拥有。阶段性专业需求可以合作，但要约定交付与交接。能够清楚描述、可靠验证和替换的能力可以按需调用。无论哪种方式，都应检查整合与验证成本、中断影响、切换难度和责任归属。" } }, { "id": "s01-12", "order": 12, "title": "不要先改组织架构：如何真正开始「重新组织」", "part": "重写管理与公司", "topic": "五张地图", "markdown_url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/articles/12-five-maps.md", "reading_url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/#/read/12", "sha256": "c83f10140b536aeba12bcc9e7f163a6e35655ae884c2e6514ce82da195f7f393", "diagram": { "url": "https://leenlbma.github.io/reorganize/images/s01-12.svg", "title": "用五张地图检查一次退款处理", "description": "工作地图检查退款怎样完成以及人与Agent怎样协作。状态地图区分已确认、推断和未知，并保留订单与沟通证据。决定权地图明确谁有权处理、谁受理异议和复核。本次试行由客服确认处理，Agent只整理材料和建议，不退款、不关单；规则外由业务负责人复核，并保留暂停入口。价值地图检查谁受益、谁承担成本、贡献怎样回报，并同时记录用户结果、处理负担与维护投入。学习地图检查哪些失败改变规则、哪些判断成为新人练习。先改变一个摩擦点，比较结果，再决定是否扩大。" } } ] }